12/16/2023 0 Comments Fuzzmeasure user guide pdfThere may be nothing whatsoever wrong with the analog hardware the original instruments in the song got created with! But each of the analog devices that was used on individual instruments was not used to help the depth or dimension or warmth of the overall sound, or to help the color or definition of each instrument in context with the rest of the instruments - they were used to help create the original sound of the individual instrument. I ask what was wrong with all the analog hardware the song got created with.ĭear Martin, for the first part of your question: I know I am speaking in totally subjective terms, never the less coming back out (2-track) to the analog domain and running THAT digital mix though a compressor and viola its sound “warmer” or “analog” or whatever (like you say) you want to call it. I just have a problem reconciling the following:įor a given professional analog hardware generating a song say, tube guitars, optical processors, VCA processors, prof. any analog processor and that your ears could tell that all is really needed was one single processor to give that “analog” sound, etc. analog mixing where you speak about summing mixer vs. I came across a section where you discuss digital vs. So, bottom line: Use with caution and knowledge, not a panacea, possibly a help, sometimes only a bandaid. If called upon to do the whole job they can literally screw up a good day :-(. The best solution is a combination of acoustical (absorption/diffusion/room construction/proper choice of monitors) followed by possibly a touchup using one of these automatic systems. I would suggest that you find a very good acoustician first and describe to him your desire to use one of these systems to “correct” your room (note the quotation marks, as any acoustician would tend to laugh at “correct” not in quotation marks. ![]() You have to be able to interpret the results and use some portion of them intelligently. Those kinds of correction systems still have to be set up by knowledgeable acousticians or they can easily over or under-correct. Thanks in advance, I totally understand if you’re too busy, I’m sure you get these annoying questions all the time!! Is it worth getting or could it be the cause of more problems? I know the best option is improving the actual acoustics of my room, but do you think this would improve my mix room until I have the time / budget for a redesign / rebuild. SOS Magazine and the AES seem to be fairly impressed with it but I wanted to get your opinion. It’s basically a measurement microphone and room correction software. I don’t know if you’ve heard of it but IK Multimedia have just released the ARC system. ![]() If you use a PC source, you can use the PC trial for free, if you have a measurement mic.Hope you and yours are well. ![]() I can't really be sure how much of the benefit is due to the EQ control and how much is due to the impulse response tech. There are a variety of reasons (psychoacoustic room issues, mic differences, taste, speaker limitations) that a standard target curve doesn't work in different rooms. Make sure you spend some time experimenting with target curves and correction limits, rather than simply using the default curve. In the past, I have always felt like room correction and even EQ was a mixed bag, where you gain something and you lose something. It's awesome at improving room issues and giving you fine control over EQ, with the ability to instantly switch between target curves to iterate toward your favorite. I have the software version of Dirac Live, but I'd expect that it works similarly to the MiniDSP version.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |